Cite Citation. Permissions Icon Permissions. Published by Oxford University Press.
All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals. Issue Section:. You do not currently have access to this article.
Download all figures. Sign in.
You could not be signed in. Sign In Forgot password?
Don't have an account? Sign in via your Institution Sign in. Purchase Subscription prices and ordering Short-term Access To purchase short term access, please sign in to your Oxford Academic account above.
View Metrics. Email alerts New issue alert. Advance article alerts.
Article activity alert. Receive exclusive offers and updates from Oxford Academic. Related articles in Google Scholar.
Thus there was no sharp drop to break the neck, but rather prolonged choking, which might be accelerated by the executioner or his assistant pulling on the legs of the convulsing victim, typically wearing special gloves made of dog leather. To that end, building a reputation for honesty, reliability, discretion, and even piety went hand in glove with gaining experience at the gallows. View all 4 comments. The historian Joel F. If he passed this final stage, Schmidt would be considered ready to start his job, as an executioner of people. That Harrington tries to illuminate the dark, complicated world of an ambitious sixteenth-century German executioner is a worthy historical goal. Related: Medieval Torture's 10 Biggest Myths.
Citing articles via Google Scholar. A Social and Cultural History.
ubopagerycoq.gq: The Faithful Executioner: Life and Death, Honor and Shame in the Turbulent Sixteenth Century (): Joel F. Harrington: Books. Editorial Reviews. From Booklist. Based on the journal of Frantz Schmidt, a Nuremburg The Faithful Executioner: Life and Death, Honor and Shame in the Turbulent Sixteenth Century . Exploring both sixteenth-century Nuremberg and the world about the city, he re-creates the social context for the flamboyant displays of.
This endeavor, as Harrington shows, had many facets. Worse than an executioner was an incompetent executioner, and Schmidt knew that those who botched these public rituals of punishment and death could themselves be torn apart by an angry crowd. This meant familiarity with swords, tongs, shackles, rope, hemp bags, hammers, and wood stakes of various sorts—all of which had to be up to the task of pulling out eyes, dismembering, or cleanly shearing off heads. Maintaining his name went beyond his gruesome professional duties.
But could an executioner really ever enjoy such pleasures? Hence, he had little compunction for his brother-in-law, an infamous country burglar named Friedrich Werner, and hanged him with stones attached to his feet. Torture is torture.
One would have felt more sympathy for Schmidt had he been a less faithful executioner. Without doubt, Schmidt deftly played the perverse hand fate dealt him. Surely there were many innocents among them. With a long history of pogroms against Jews, Nuremberg has long had a central place in the history of torture, execution, and the problem of how to judge such acts.